Sent: 9/2/2019 12:58:43 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Sharon4CouncilConstitutionalChallengeConsentAgenda's
Labor Day Mon 2Sept2019
To Above Named;Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates 2007
Affiant Widow,Whistleblower,White Woman must before Affiant re Penalty of Perjury and
before I kick the Bucket MUST expose Corruption by City,County,Complicit with
Courts and Carter Family. Influence of Muslim forcing Sharia Law.
ISSUES
CONSTITUTIONALITY Consent Agenda's,COMPLICITY,Carter,Council,Courts
HOUSING TRUSTS DESTROYED VIA LAWYERS
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court
TOM PEREZ,DAVID LILLHAUG,NOW
Justice,Federal Judge DFL Michael Davis
Who must not and could not Terminate a RICO CASE,
with Crimes, against humanity, without Jury Trial etc.
Please note DARK DFL Davis Black Judge also swore in
Muslim Keith Ellison now MNAG on the Quoran.
| Minnesota District Court | |
| Judge: | Michael J Davis |
| Referred: | Steven E Rau |
| Case #: | 0:04-cv-02632 |
| Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Cause | 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | May 05, 2004 |
| Re-opened: | Nov 30, 2010 |
| Terminated: | Jul 18, 2017 |
ORDER granting 198 Motion for Summary Judgment., IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 198 in Civil No. 04-2632, Docket No. 173 in Civil No. 05-461, and Docket No. 166 in Civil No. 05-1348] are GRANTED. 2. All Counts in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. 3. Counts VI in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they are based on the right to freedom from the taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Count VIII in Civil No. 05-1348 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. Except as stated in paragraphs 2-4, all remaining claims in Civil Nos. 04 2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 18, 2008. (slf) Modified text on 12/19/2008 (jdf).
Specifically Mayor Melvin Carter Son of Toni Carter Ramsey Co. Commissioner. City Council enbanc, Media,Government etal.
COUNT I CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE CITY AGENDA'S ON A WEEKLY BASIS
Saint Paul, Minnesota | The most livable city in America
Saint Paul, Minnesota | The most livable city in America
Current version Agenda Wed.4Sept2019
|
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocatesf Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Ass
.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053
COUNT II Abuse of Office,Anti-Trust,Deceptive Trade,Disparity.
Melvin served on the Saint Paul City Council from 2008 to 2013, serving as the vice chair of the Council . Ward 1
Lawyer David Lillhaug, current Justice, dying of Throat Cancer, Parkinson
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
Count III HUD Records Nov13th2012
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch
Sep 7, 2008 - Saint Paul/ Federal Fair Housing Lawsuits, Meet Victim Mark E. Meysembourg ... Frank J. Steinhauser, III, et aI., Plaintiffs, v. City of St. Paul, et aI., ... My last residence in Minnesota was at 772 East Cook, in Saint Paul where I .... charged. 15. Between 2002 and 2004, the City claimed it was applying its higher ..
.
CONCLUSION used again Labor Day Mon.2Sept2019
13 years later Forensic Files
THEREFORE;
WE THE PEOPLE OF USA, MINNESOTA, HOMEGROWN
MUST BRING TO THE BAR OF PUBLIC OPINION
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Abolish City st.Paul Consent Agenda, legislative branch, delegating Jurisdiction/authority, started by DSI Inspectors
in Sharons and Lennys case ED SMITH, Executive Branch.
Reinstate Steinhausers RICO CLAIMS and Sharons Defaults
now in the Millions.
There is a pressing need to relieve the Appellant in this action of further official harassment by issuing an injunction that bars further action by the agency against Appellee be stayed until the agency state in an appeals summary exactly what issues it has with Appellant’s property. Appellant reasonably believes that Respondent’s vague position and refusal to state any specific facts, is indicative that the actions of the respondents are for the purpose of violating Appellant’s rights of privacy and to harass and retaliate against the Appellant.
April 18, 2006 _/s/ ECF-P165913 sa1299__________________________
Mrs. Sharon Anderson, Appellant-Relator-Removant
697 Surrey, St. Paul, MM V: 651 776 5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
etermined, at a hearing, as the agency refuses to state these issues in an appeal summary before hearing.
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
