From: Sharon4Anderson
To: askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, askdrlaura@foxnews.com, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, edward.cleary@courts.state.mn.us, joanne.smith@courts.state.mn.us, kathleen.gearin@courts.state.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us
CC: COURTWATCHERS_OF_AMERICA@yahoogroups.com, FreedomLawSchool@yahoogroups.com, newstips@wcco.com, thauser@kstp.com, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us
Sent: 1/5/2010 10:11:23 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: US Dept of Justice Open ltr.Sheriff Bob Fletcher: FREE TIM KINLEYWrit HB
From: Sharon4Anderson
To: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, joanne.smith@courts.state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, .CC: Sharon4Mayor, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, al.carlson@co.ramsey.mn.us, dale.skov@co.ramsey.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, webmaster@am1500.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, gljoe@am1500.com
Sent: 1/5/2010 10:03:12 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: US Dept of Justice Open ltr.Sheriff Bob Fletcher: FREE TIM KINLEYWrit HB
Tues 5Jan2010To Ramsey County Corrections Superintendent Al Carlson andSheriff Bob Fletcher: Michael Campion DPS Media et alCase Manager Dale Skov651-266-1409 Fax: 651-266-1412re: Prisioner Tim Kinley File no 62F196163 (Cleary)(Smith) Incarcerated 20Nov09Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (Prisoner) - Minnesota Federal forms 203.120SCL - Writ of Habeas CorpusAPPLICABILITY: Minnesota Correctional Facility – St. Cloud (MCF-SCL). INSTRUCTION: MCF-SCL will honor all Writs of Habeas Corpus and Orders for Transportation. ... After these copies are printed, Records staff must email the form to the ... to send the offender to the Intake Unit in "state issue" clothing only. ...
www.doc.state.mn.us/DocPolicy2/FormsWorking/.../203.120SCL.htm - CachedISSUES:1. Is Tim Kinley Political Activist, Candidate MNHouse 55A,Cable_TalkShow Host,Great Fatherbeing held in the Ramsey County Correction (4) 6 months as a Political Prisioner? YESi. Denied to work on his Cable Show, or work to earn a living2. Has Judge Edward Cleary exceeded his Authority/Jurisdiction/ Hienous Bias towardTim Kinley and others who speak out for Judicial Reform ?a. Denial of Jury Trial, Evidentary Hearings YEScovert coverup of Aaron Foster Grand Jury Indictments of Barb Winn YES3. Separation of Powers Doctrine: Can the Judicial Department "take" Drivers LicenseBusiness Licenses's on Bogus Judgments of alleged Child Support withoutCriminal Charges of Car Driving Violations or Criminal Charges of Business Violations ?4. Cable Show Bob Zick and Nancy Lazaryan 23Dec09 put out a Plea for Tim KinleyAffiants Channel 15 last nite "Stating Free Tim Kenley Judge Joanne Smith5. For the Health,Safety,Welfare of Tim Kinley and others imprisioned or Committed to State Institutions re: http://www.lufsky.blogspot.com/ and the "Murder"i.THEREFORE: THE UNDERSIGNED Sharon Scarrella Anderson with Standing as a Concerned Citizen, Victim of the "takings" of Drivers License without Compensation triggering "taking" of 91 Chrysler with disabled license Platesre: 62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth) A0-2031 (Toussaint_called the Ramsey Sheriff Bob Fletcher 651-266-9350 Fax: 9351 was told by Noel thatTim Kinley was transferred to WorkHouse 18Dec09Call to Workhouse 651-266-1400 Dale Skov 266-1409 Fax 266-1412
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back
Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help Register Of ActionsCase No. 62-F1-96-000163
BARBARA A. KINLEY vs.TIMOTHY C. KINLEY & Ramsey County, Intervenor [CHW REMOVED] [GWB RECUSED]{EFB REMOVED]** Box File ** [J&D 120997 FLINN J(CAF) 1031 218-239] §
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Dissolution with Child Date Filed: 01/23/1996 Location: Ramsey Family Main Party Information
Lead Attorneys IntervenorCOUNTY OF RAMSEY
ST PAUL, MN 55102 PetitionerKINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128
08/19/1967DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained RespondentKINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered
08/19/1967DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained RespondentKINLEY, BARBARA A.
OAKDALE, MN 55128Removed: 12/24/2007 Ordered
08/19/1967DUNN, TIMOTHY W J Retained RespondentKINLEY, TIMOTHY C.
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
05/26/1958CLARK, JILL ELEANOR RetainedEvents & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS 12/10/1997 Default (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)
Converted Disposition: Related Participants:
KINLEY, TIMOTHY C.07/21/1998 Closed (Judicial Officer: Judge, Presiding)
Monetary Award (Status: Expired, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 07/21/1998, Docketed: 07/28/1998, 1:13 PM, Original Principal: $10,346.99) 05/20/2008 Closed at filing (Judicial Officer: Bastian, Gary W.) 02/09/2009 Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00) 02/09/2009 Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Original Principal: $500.00) 02/09/2009 Judgment (Judicial Officer: Ostby, Elena L.)
Monetary Award (Status: Active, Debtor: TIMOTHY C. KINLEY, Entered: 02/09/2009, Docketed: 03/25/2009, 8:54 AM, Original Principal: $32,403.68) OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/23/1996 Converted Filing Fee 01/23/1996 FLD-Case Filed 01/23/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing 02/16/1996 DOC-Document Filed 02/23/1996 Converted Filing Fee 02/23/1996 CRP-Certificate of Representation 02/26/1996 DOC-Document Filed 03/01/1996 Temporary Hearing (9:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/23/1996 RSI-Review for Scheduling Information 04/23/1996 RSO-Review for Scheduling Order 05/23/1996 DOC-Document Filed 05/29/1996 NUL-Null Activity 05/30/1996 AJU-Adjudicated 05/30/1996 DOC-Document Filed 05/30/1996 ORD-Order 06/04/1996 DOC-Document Filed 06/14/1996 DOC-Document Filed 06/21/1996 RSO-Review for Scheduling Order 06/24/1996 DOC-Document Filed 06/28/1996 DOC-Document Filed 07/17/1996 DOC-Document Filed 07/19/1996 DOC-Document Filed 08/12/1996 FSF-Family Scheduling Form 08/13/1996 CANCELED Scheduling Conference (10:00 AM) Other08/20/1996 ORD-Order 08/20/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/28/1996 DOC-Document Filed 09/09/1996 ORD-Order 09/25/1996 DRV-ADR Status Review 09/25/1996 ORD-Order 09/26/1996 DOC-Document Filed 11/18/1996 JAS-Judge Assignment 11/18/1996 ORD-Order 11/18/1996 SCH-Schedule Hearing 11/18/1996 Pre-trial (9:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
12/06/1996 DOC-Document Filed 01/03/1997 DOC-Document Filed 01/06/1997 ORD-Order 01/07/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 01/27/1997 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) Other02/18/1997 SPT-Schedule Pre-Trial 02/24/1997 CANCELED Pre-trial (9:00 AM) Other05/05/1997 DOC-Document Filed 05/12/1997 Pre-trial (1:30 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/13/1997 DOC-Document Filed 06/03/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 06/24/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 06/24/1997 Hearing (9:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/25/1997 Hearing (9:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/28/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/15/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/18/1997 Court Trial (9:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
08/19/1997 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/19/1997 CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM) Other09/08/1997 Hearing (1:30 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
12/09/1997 CLO-Closed 12/09/1997 DCR-Decree 12/11/1997 DOC-Document Filed 12/22/1997 DOC-Document Filed 03/09/1998 ARC-Archive 03/23/1998 SCH-Schedule Hearing 04/13/1998 DOC-Document Filed 04/13/1998 DOC-Document Filed 04/17/1998 ORD-Order 04/27/1998 SCH-Schedule Hearing 04/28/1998 CANCELED Hearing (2:15 PM) Other05/15/1998 DOC-Document Filed 05/20/1998 DOC-Document Filed 05/21/1998 DOC-Document Filed 05/22/1998 DOC-Document Filed 05/26/1998 Hearing (9:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/13/1998 ORD-Order 07/21/1998 ORD-Order 07/28/1998 JDG-Entry of Judgment 07/31/1998 NOT-Notice 08/12/1998 ORD-Order 08/24/1998 ORD-Order 01/19/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing 01/26/1999 DOC-Document Filed 02/11/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing 02/16/1999 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) Other02/26/1999 SCH-Schedule Hearing 03/30/1999 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) Other04/07/1999 DOC-Document Filed 04/09/1999 DOC-Document Filed 04/20/1999 Hearing (10:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/17/1999 ORD-Order 08/19/1999 DOC-Document Filed 05/01/2000 DOC-Document Filed 05/01/2000 POS-Proof of Service 05/01/2000 XPO-Expedited Process 06/08/2000 SUB-Submitted 06/08/2000 Hearing (1:15 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
06/21/2000 AJU-Adjudicated 06/22/2000 ORS-Child Support Order 12/03/2001 SCH-Schedule Hearing 02/08/2002 RAS-Reassignment 02/08/2002 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement 02/25/2002 NOT-Notice 03/04/2002 AFF-Affidavit 03/06/2002 NOT-Notice 03/11/2002 SUB-Submitted 03/11/2002 Hearing (2:00 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/12/2002 DOC-Document Filed 04/15/2002 AJU-Adjudicated 04/16/2002 ORD-Order 04/17/2002 LTR-Letters 04/22/2002 LTR-Letters 04/30/2002 MTN-Motion Filed 04/30/2002 POS-Proof of Service 04/30/2002 XPO-Expedited Process 05/23/2002 NOT-Notice 06/04/2002 LTR-Letters 06/05/2002 LTR-Letters 06/12/2002 LTR-Letters 06/25/2002 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement 07/02/2002 RAS-Reassignment 07/12/2002 NOT-Notice 07/12/2002 POS-Proof of Service 07/12/2002 SUB-Submitted 07/12/2002 XPO-Expedited Process 07/12/2002 Hearing (9:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/13/2002 AJU-Adjudicated 07/13/2002 ORS-Child Support Order 07/16/2002 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) Other07/18/2002 NOT-Notice 07/29/2002 DCS-Dismiss Child Support 07/11/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/26/2003 AFF-Affidavit 08/26/2003 MTN-Motion Filed 08/27/2003 LTR-Letters 08/27/2003 RAS-Reassignment 08/27/2003 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement 09/09/2003 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) Other12/01/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing 12/02/2003 SCH-Schedule Hearing 12/05/2003 MTN-Motion Filed 01/12/2004 CANCELED Hearing (9:30 AM) Other02/09/2004 MTN-Motion Filed 02/17/2004 AFF-Affidavit 02/23/2004 Hearing (10:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/15/2004 ORD-Order 04/19/2004 AJU-Adjudicated 04/19/2004 ORD-Order 04/30/2004 POS-Proof of Service 04/30/2004 XPO-Expedited Process 05/06/2004 RAS-Reassignment 05/06/2004 UAG-Unassigned-Agreement 06/08/2004 NOT-Notice 06/11/2004 ORD-Order 06/16/2004 SUB-Submitted 06/16/2004 Hearing (2:20 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
07/08/2004 AJU-Adjudicated 07/08/2004 ORS-Child Support Order 08/09/2004 DOC-Document Filed 08/10/2004 SCH-Schedule Hearing 08/15/2004 RVW-Case Status Review 11/09/2004 CANCELED Hearing (1:30 PM) Other12/29/2004 DOC-Document Filed 01/03/2005 AFF-Affidavit 01/06/2005 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) Other02/17/2005 POS-Proof of Service 02/17/2005 XPO-Expedited Process 03/04/2005 DOC-Document Filed 03/10/2005 Hearing (9:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
03/23/2005 AJU-Adjudicated 03/23/2005 ORS-Child Support Order 03/23/2005 SUB-Submitted 03/23/2005 Hearing (10:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/18/2005 Hearing (2:30 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/09/2005 SUB-Submitted 05/10/2005 DOC-Document Filed 05/16/2005 SUB-Submitted 07/12/2005 CANCELED Hearing (10:30 AM) Other08/08/2005 AJU-Adjudicated 08/08/2005 ORD-Order 08/12/2005 DOC-Document Filed 08/12/2005 LTR-Letters 09/16/2005 SCH-Schedule Hearing 09/21/2005 MTN-Motion Filed 10/07/2005 ORD-Order 11/02/2005 MTN-Motion Filed 11/15/2005 CANCELED Hearing (2:00 PM) Other11/18/2005 NOT-Notice 01/13/2006 DOC-Document Filed 01/19/2006 Hearing (3:30 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
02/03/2006 SUB-Submitted 02/22/2006 AJU-Adjudicated 02/22/2006 CLO-Closed 02/22/2006 ORD-Order 02/28/2006 POS-Proof of Service 02/28/2006 XPO-Expedited Process 03/27/2006 POS-Proof of Service 03/27/2006 XPO-Expedited Process 03/28/2006 AJU-Adjudicated 03/28/2006 CLO-Closed 03/28/2006 ORS-Child Support Order 03/28/2006 SUB-Submitted 03/28/2006 Hearing (8:30 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
04/07/2006 MCC-Motion for Correct 04/07/2006 POS-Proof of Service 04/14/2006 DOC-Document Filed 04/17/2006 SUB-Submitted 04/20/2006 DOC-Document Filed 04/24/2006 AFF-Affidavit 04/24/2006 ORD-Order 04/26/2006 AJU-Adjudicated 04/26/2006 CLO-Closed 04/26/2006 NUL-Null Activity 04/26/2006 ORS-Child Support Order 04/26/2006 ORS-Child Support Order 04/26/2006 SUB-Submitted 04/26/2006 Hearing (10:00 AM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
05/15/2006 NOT-Notice 05/23/2006 NOA-Notice of Appeal 05/23/2006 ORD-Order 06/05/2006 ORD-Order 06/15/2006 RVW-Case Status Review 06/22/2006 ORD-Order 07/08/2006 CLO-Closed 07/08/2006 CLO-Closed 07/08/2006 NOT-Notice 07/10/2006 ORD-Order 08/24/2006 ORD-Order 08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed 08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed 08/30/2006 DOC-Document Filed 09/13/2006 DOC-Document Filed 09/13/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed 09/15/2006 DOC-Document Filed 09/15/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed 10/16/2006 ORD-Order 10/17/2006 DOC-Document Filed 10/17/2006 TSC-Transcript Filed 10/27/2006 CLO-Closed 10/27/2006 DOC-Document Filed 11/20/2006 NOT-Notice 11/20/2006 POS-Proof of Service 12/11/2006 DOC-Document Filed 12/11/2006 ORD-Order 12/13/2006 LTR-Letters 12/14/2006 NOT-Notice 12/14/2006 ORD-Order 12/18/2006 DOC-Document Filed 12/18/2006 ORD-Order 12/19/2006 SUB-Submitted 12/19/2006 CANCELED Hearing (1:00 PM) Other12/19/2006 Hearing (1:00 PM) Result: Converted Activity Status Flag Occurred
01/02/2007 AJU-Adjudicated 01/02/2007 CLO-Closed 01/02/2007 ORS-Child Support Order 01/16/2007 CANCELED Hearing (2:30 PM) Other02/02/2007 DOC-Document Filed 04/03/2007 NOT-Notice 05/23/2007 SCH-Schedule Hearing 06/11/2007 MTN-Motion Filed 06/11/2007 OSC-Order to Show Cause 07/05/2007 NOT-Notice 07/11/2007 ORD-Order 07/16/2007 AFF-Affidavit 09/19/2007 Appellate Court Order 09/21/2007 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel 09/21/2007 Affidavit of Service 09/24/2007 Affidavit-Other 09/25/2007 Hearing (9:00 AM) Result: Held
09/25/2007 Reset by Court to 09/25/2007 09/27/2007 Order-Other 10/22/2007 Findings and Order 10/30/2007 Notice of Filing of Order 11/06/2007 Motion and Affidavit 11/07/2007 CANCELED Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) Other11/16/2007 Appellate Court Order 11/20/2007 Order-Other 12/11/2007 Other Document 12/21/2007 Order Discharging Guardian Ad Litem 12/24/2007 Notice of Case Filing 12/24/2007 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition 12/24/2007 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 12/24/2007 Motion 01/11/2008 Appellate Court Order 02/22/2008 Notice of Hearing 03/20/2008 Order-Other 04/17/2008 Notice of Hearing 05/06/2008 Order to Show Cause Hearing (10:30 AM) Result: Held
05/12/2008 Notice of Case Filing 05/14/2008 Other Document 05/20/2008 Order-Other 05/22/2008 Notice for Implementation of Cost of Living Adjustment 05/23/2008 Appellate Court Order 06/03/2008 Notice of Case Assignment 06/12/2008 Notice to Remove 06/26/2008 Certificate on Notice of Removal/Affidavit of Prejudice 06/26/2008 Notice of Case Assignment 07/09/2008 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 07/09/2008 Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 07/15/2008 Notice of Motion and Affidavit 07/28/2008 Converted Pending Activity 08/28/2008 Notice of Hearing 11/05/2008 Affidavit-Other 11/05/2008 Other Document 11/05/2008 Affidavit of Service 11/10/2008 Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:30 PM) Result: Held
11/10/2008 Reset by Court to 11/10/2008 11/10/2008 Taken Under Advisement 11/20/2008 Notice of Case Filing 11/20/2008 Correspondence 11/20/2008 Other Document 12/04/2008 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition 12/04/2008 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 12/11/2008 Appellate Court Order 01/13/2009 Notice of Hearing 02/02/2009 Affidavit-Other 02/02/2009 Affidavit of Service 02/03/2009 CANCELED Order to Show Cause Hearing (2:00 PM) Settled
02/03/2009 Reset by Court to 02/03/2009 02/09/2009 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order 02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry 02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment 02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry 02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment 02/09/2009 Processed Judgment Entry 02/09/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment 02/12/2009 Notice of Filing of Order 02/12/2009 Affidavit of Service 03/24/2009 Affidavit of Identification 03/25/2009 Processed Judgment Docketing 03/25/2009 Notice of Docketing of Judgment 04/14/2009 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition 04/14/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 04/14/2009 Motion 04/15/2009 Notice of Case Filing 05/01/2009 Appellate Court Order 05/13/2009 Order Denying In Forma Pauperis Petition 05/13/2009 Motion 05/13/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 05/22/2009 Appellate Court Order 06/12/2009 Notice of Motion and Motion 06/12/2009 Affidavit-Other 06/12/2009 Affidavit of Service 06/17/2009 Notice-Other 06/26/2009 Notice of Hearing 08/31/2009 Affidavit-Other 08/31/2009 Affidavit of Service 09/02/2009 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel 09/02/2009 Correspondence 09/03/2009 Motion Hearing (1:30 PM) Result: Held
07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 Reset by Court to 09/03/2009 09/15/2009 Order-Other 09/15/2009 Other Document 09/15/2009 Order-Other 09/15/2009 Order-Other 09/15/2009 Warrant Issued 09/16/2009 Correspondence 09/16/2009 Affidavit of Service 09/29/2009 Notice of Filing of Order 09/29/2009 Affidavit of Service 10/07/2009 Correspondence 11/05/2009 Order-Other 11/23/2009 Warrant Returned 11/25/2009 Order-Other 12/21/2009 Correspondence 12/21/2009 Notice of Appearance 12/21/2009 Motion 12/21/2009 Correspondence 12/24/2009 Notice-Other 01/25/2010 Motion Hearing (10:00 AM) Financial Information
Obligor KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. Total Financial Assessment 235.00 Total Payments and Credits 235.00 Balance Due as of 01/05/2010 0.00 11/07/2007 Transaction Assessment 55.00 11/07/2007 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2007-01644 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (55.00) 07/15/2008 Transaction Assessment 55.00 07/15/2008 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2008-04419 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (55.00) 04/09/2009 Transaction Assessment 20.00 04/09/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-02614 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (20.00) 05/12/2009 Transaction Assessment 5.00 05/12/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-03566 KINLEY, TIMOTHY C. (5.00) 12/24/2009 Transaction Assessment 100.00 12/24/2009 Mail Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-09142 CLARK, JILL ELEANOR (100.00) Petitioner KINLEY, BARBARA A. Total Financial Assessment 10.00 Total Payments and Credits 10.00 Balance Due as of 01/05/2010 0.00 04/29/2009 Transaction Assessment 10.00 04/29/2009 Counter Payment Receipt # FM62-2009-03207 KINLEY, BARBARA A. (10.00) In a message dated 1/5/2010 10:03:12 A.M. Central Standard Time, Sharon4Anderson writes:Tues 5Jan2010To Ramsey County Corrections Superintendent Al Carlson andSheriff Bob Fletcher: Michael Campion DPS Media et alCase Manager Dale Skov651-266-1409 Fax: 651-266-1412re: Prisioner Tim Kinley File no 62F196163 (Cleary)(Smith) Incarcerated 20Nov09Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (Prisoner) - Minnesota Federal forms 203.120SCL - Writ of Habeas CorpusAPPLICABILITY: Minnesota Correctional Facility – St. Cloud (MCF-SCL). INSTRUCTION: MCF-SCL will honor all Writs of Habeas Corpus and Orders for Transportation. ... After these copies are printed, Records staff must email the form to the ... to send the offender to the Intake Unit in "state issue" clothing only. ...
www.doc.state.mn.us/DocPolicy2/FormsWorking/.../203.120SCL.htm - CachedWelcome to the United States Department of Justicehttp://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/ACD5E44A-3C7A-4FF5-9289-142E73723DDB/15617/April1420091.pdf page 15CC: US JUSTICE: B.TODD.JONES (MN) askdoj@usdoj.govJUDGES: kathleen.gearin@courts.state.mn.us john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us gregg.johnson@courts.state.mn.us edward.cleary@courts.state.mn.us et alMEDIA: AS INTEREST APPEAR: dorrick@pioneerpress.com rrosario@pioneerpress.com bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com et alTO THE ABOVE NAMED: Specifically Chief Judge MN Eric MagnusonMEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF DEPARTMENT LITIGATING COMPONENTS HANDLING CRIMINAL MATTERS
ALL UNITED STATES ATTORNEYSMonday, January 4, 2010
FROM: David W. Ogden
Deputy Attorney GeneralSUBJECT: Requirement for Office Discovery Policies in Criminal Matters Earlier this year, I asked the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division and the Chair of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee to convene a working group to undertake a thorough review of the Department of Justice’s policies, practices, and training related to criminal case management and discovery and to evaluate areas for improvement. Members of this working group included senior level prosecutors from United States Attorneys’ Offices (USAOs) and Main Justice, Information Technology support personnel, and law enforcement representatives. In addition, members of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee and the Department’s Criminal Chiefs Working Group reviewed and provided comments on the Working Group Report. The case management and discovery working group examined current Department of Justice policies, and surveyed all of the USAOs, the criminal litigating components of Main Justice, and the Department of Justice’s law enforcement agencies, as well as the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, to evaluate current discovery practices, case management practices, and related training, and to identify areas for improvement.
Today, in response to some of the recommendations in the Working Group Report, I sent out a memorandum to all prosecutors that included Guidance for Prosecutors Regarding Criminal Discovery that prosecutors should follow to help ensure that they meet discovery obligations in future cases. This guidance is not intended to establish new disclosure obligations. Those obligations are already set forth in Fed.R.Crim.P. 16 and 26.2, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and 18 U.S.C. §3500 (the Jencks Act). In addition, Department policy provides for broader disclosures of exculpatory and impeachment information than Brady and Giglio require. See USAM §9-5.001. Prosecutors in every district and component must comply with legal requirements and with Department policy. Moreover, there are times when providing discovery broader than that provided for even by current Department policy serves the interests of justice. Providing broad and early discovery often promotes the truth-seeking mission of the Department and fosters a speedy resolution of a case. On the other hand, there are times when countervailing considerations counsel against broad and early disclosure. For these reasons, the discovery guidance is intended to assure that prosecutors make considered decisions about whether to disclose information beyond the requirements of law and policy and when to disclose it.
The Working Group Report recognized that some local variation in discovery practices is inevitable. Inconsistent discovery practices among prosecutors within the same office, however, can lead to burdensome litigation over the appropriate scope and timing of disclosures, judicial frustration and confusion, and disparate discovery disclosures to a defendant based solely on the identity of the prosecutor who happens to have been assigned a case. In many instances, the discovery guidance directs that prosecutors be familiar with circuit and district court precedent and the local rules of the district in which they practice.
In order to assist prosecutors maintain this familiarity and to establish uniform criminal discovery practices within the same office, I am today directing the USAOs and each Department litigating component handling criminal matters to develop a discovery policy that reflects circuit and district court precedent and local rules and practices.
This directive requires each office to establish a discovery policy with which prosecutors in that office must comply. The policy should also provide that specific, case-related considerations may warrant a departure from the uniform discovery practices of the office. Because it is expected that such considerations will sometimes justify a departure from the particular office practice, your policy must set forth procedures prosecutors are required to follow to obtain supervisory approval to depart from the uniform practices in an appropriate case.
Although the format is left to your discretion, the policy should address recurring issues such as: the timing of disclosures; disclosure of reports of interview for testifying or non-testifying witnesses; providing disclosure beyond the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P 16 and 26.2, Brady, Giglio, the Jencks Act, and USAM §9-5.001; the scope of the “prosecution team” in national security cases1 or cases involving regulatory agencies, parallel proceedings, or task force investigations; storing and reviewing substantive, case-related communications such as email; obtaining Giglio information from local law enforcement officers; disclosure questions related to trial preparation witness interviews; disclosure of agent notes; and maintaining a record of disclosures. I encourage you to seek input from investigative agencies regarding these issues as well.
The Criminal Discovery and Case Management Survey conducted as part of the Working Group’s efforts showed that 90% of USAOs currently have standardized discovery policies or practices, so in many offices this directive requires only that you re-visit or formalize your current policy and revise as necessary to make sure that your policy reflects law and practice and addresses, to the extent appropriate, the issues set forth above.
The Working Group survey showed that 52% of the litigating components reported having standardized discovery policies or practices. I recognize that the litigating components that practice in multiple districts cannot develop a practice to reflect the local rules and practices of each district. Each litigating component should nonetheless develop a policy that guides the discovery practice of the component, understanding that litigating component prosecutors should examine–and in appropriate circumstances defer to–local policy when litigating in a particular district. Component policies should also address as appropriate the topics set forth above.
I encourage you to create or modify your policy as soon as possible, but in any event you are directed to have a revised or new policy in place no later than March 31, 2010, and to provide a copy to the Office of the Associate Attorney General and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. USAOs should also provide a copy to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
I am confident that this effort along with the other steps being taken in response to the Working Group report will facilitate discovery practices that comply with our legal obligations and enhance our ability to achieve justice in every case. Thank you very much for your cooperation in this effort.
1The Department will be issuing additional guidance on this issue by separate memorandum
Thank You for conversation regarding pdf format for all files andTim Kinley 62f196163 I cannot find any files involving Judge Joanne Smith?I call upon Governor Pawlenty and Chief Judge Magnuson to cause the release of Tim Kinley before Christmas of this year.
I call upon Governor Pawlenty and Chief Judge Magnuson to expunge the record and forgive all related fines and child support outstanding for Tim Kinley.
I call upon the Ramsey County Bar to provide Tim Kinley with top quality pro bono legal assistance in straightening out all of these injustices. (If for no other reason for being to spinelss to stand up to the corrupt Judges in the first place.
I call upon Governor Pawlenty, Chief Judge Magnuson and the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards to remove Judge Joanne Smith from the bench for life and further for her to be disbarred. I am told that MN Statute 351.02 ( http://twurl.cc/1yjb ) requires that upon any Government official violating their oath of office, their office becomes immediately vacant. Judge Joanne Smith violated her oath to uphold the Constitution. She violated Tim Kinley’s Constitutional Rights knowingly, maliciously and purposefully. Per Statute, she should have been immediately removed from the bench when Tim Kinley won his appeal. I call on whatever Government agency Governor, who is charged with that duty, to perform their duty and remove Judge Joanne Smith from the bench.
The State of Minnesota has failed Tim Kinley. He was the aggrieved party, His wife committed adultery and left him for another man. She took his children. She made untruthful allegations. There is a statute on the books that provides for the criminal prosecution of adulterers. How does the state go from not charging her with that to granting her custody of the children and requiring financial support from theRe: SCAP : Joanne Smith
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle
Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA