The court said the $27 million-per-year contract would remain intact, as would all of its associated costs and obligations. However, the city may have to do some legal scrambling to create new ordinances around billing and enforcement.
Bottom line: St. Paul is still on the hook for $27 million to the trash haulers next year.
New Questions How can the City now set the Rates for Trash Hauling
File #: Ord 19-67 Version: 1 Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Second Reading
In control: City Council
Final action:
Title: Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.
Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen
Date Name District Opinion Comment Action
10/17/2019 10:24 AM CandidateSharonAnderson Against For years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.com therefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrust
A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. vs. https://www.stpaul.gov/file/documents/media-root/final-signed-contract
The agency’s powers are subordinate to the Minnesota and US constitution and Minnesota law defines; for legal purposes in determinations of fact and law; acceptable interpretations of words in statutes:
apparantly heard wrong that City was setting the Rates for Trash Haulers
called 651-266-8560 Mayor 266-8510
Can't find on legistar the Citys Rate Setting on this Trash Issue
Affiant further State and Allege
How can the City St. Paul,MN set the Rates 1983 up to the present
for the NonProfit District Heating,
Then apparantly the City maybe setting the Rates via Illegal Contract for the 6 or 7 Trash Haulers all for Profit. Interfering with Citizens Rights to Commerce for themselves.
The ordinance up for vote only outlines the rules for the trash program. Mayor Melvin Carter has said voting it down will not get rid of the system entirely.
It's been about seven weeks since the Supreme Court upheld the decision to put it on the ballot.
The court’s rationale is expected to be released on Wednesday.
Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during February 20 to March 21, 2019. (File No. J1911E, Assessment No. 198318)
Use of ***essments without decending to particulars then placing Liens on Propertys is Anti-Trust, Constitutionality of Consent Agenda http://sharon4council.blogspot.com probably 88 propertys involved Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka 2nd Husband Mike Hahm Dirctor Parks and Rec Conflicts,Ponzi Revenue Raising Schemne to Steal Propertys without Quiet Titles, Marketable and Valid Complaints Naming Who,What and When DSI Inspectors?
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator's proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch
VideoVideo
